https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172213 A second writ petition seeking the same relief was not maintainable after the competent authority had rejected the school's representation by a reasoned order that was never challenged, and later representations did not revive the cause of action. The norms in G.O.Ms. No. 340 Education dated 01.04.1992 did not apply because the school was upgraded as a high school in 1988-89, outside the covered period, and the relevant student strength remained below 300. Rule 6(2) of the Tamil Nadu Minority Schools (Recognition and Pay of Grant) Rules, 1977 permitted approval only for staff employed against sanctioned posts, so appointment to an unsanctioned post could not be approved. Reliance on G.O.Ms. No. 245 Education Department dated 21.02.1970 was misplaced, as courts cannot direct creation of posts. en-us Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 07:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172213 A second writ petition seeking the same relief was not maintainable after the competent authority had rejected the school's representation by a reasoned order that was never challenged, and later representations did not revive the cause of action. The norms in G.O.Ms. No. 340 Education dated 01.04.1992 did not apply because the school was upgraded as a high school in 1988-89, outside the covered period, and the relevant student strength remained below 300. Rule 6(2) of the Tamil Nadu Minority Schools (Recognition and Pay of Grant) Rules, 1977 permitted approval only for staff employed against sanctioned posts, so appointment to an unsanctioned post could not be approved. Reliance on G.O.Ms. No. 245 Education Department dated 21.02.1970 was misplaced, as courts cannot direct creation of posts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172213