https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172212 Removal of a workman's name from employment rolls constitutes termination amounting to retrenchment and is invalid unless mandatory conditions precedent, including compliance with section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, are met. Standing orders cannot justify removal before the prescribed period of continuous absence expires. Reinstatement awarded for invalid retrenchment is not subject to interference under Article 226 absent a manifest legal or jurisdictional error. A challenge to an industrial-dispute reference or to section 2A requires an adequate factual basis, while an Article 14 objection already resolved against the challenger cannot be reopened through a new ground. en-us Mon, 03 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172212 Removal of a workman's name from employment rolls constitutes termination amounting to retrenchment and is invalid unless mandatory conditions precedent, including compliance with section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, are met. Standing orders cannot justify removal before the prescribed period of continuous absence expires. Reinstatement awarded for invalid retrenchment is not subject to interference under Article 226 absent a manifest legal or jurisdictional error. A challenge to an industrial-dispute reference or to section 2A requires an adequate factual basis, while an Article 14 objection already resolved against the challenger cannot be reopened through a new ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172212