https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172212 A challenge to the industrial dispute reference and to section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act failed because the objection lacked factual foundation, and the Article 14 attack was barred by an earlier ruling upholding the reference provisions. The workman's striking off the rolls was treated as termination of service amounting to retrenchment, and the standing order basis also failed because the required period of continuous absence had not elapsed. As the mandatory conditions for retrenchment under section 25F were not met, and no jurisdictional or legal error justified interference, the award of reinstatement was upheld and the employer's challenge failed. en-us Mon, 03 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172212 A challenge to the industrial dispute reference and to section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act failed because the objection lacked factual foundation, and the Article 14 attack was barred by an earlier ruling upholding the reference provisions. The workman's striking off the rolls was treated as termination of service amounting to retrenchment, and the standing order basis also failed because the required period of continuous absence had not elapsed. As the mandatory conditions for retrenchment under section 25F were not met, and no jurisdictional or legal error justified interference, the award of reinstatement was upheld and the employer's challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172212