https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262629 The Employees' Insurance Court lacked jurisdiction to grant exemption from the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, because Section 87 vests that power exclusively in the appropriate Government and subjects it to the statutory procedure. Section 75(1)(g) is limited to disputes concerning contribution, benefit, dues, and other matters triable under the Act, and does not include exemption from the Act's operation. Consent of the parties, or a prior direction by the High Court, could not confer jurisdiction where none existed. The exemption order and the consequential setting aside of the demand notices were therefore void, and the High Court's reversal was upheld. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262629 The Employees' Insurance Court lacked jurisdiction to grant exemption from the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, because Section 87 vests that power exclusively in the appropriate Government and subjects it to the statutory procedure. Section 75(1)(g) is limited to disputes concerning contribution, benefit, dues, and other matters triable under the Act, and does not include exemption from the Act's operation. Consent of the parties, or a prior direction by the High Court, could not confer jurisdiction where none existed. The exemption order and the consequential setting aside of the demand notices were therefore void, and the High Court's reversal was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262629