https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172204 The Supreme Court emphasized the stringent criteria for entertaining a review petition, highlighting that it should only be allowed in cases of glaring omissions, patent mistakes, or grave errors due to judicial fallibility. Mere repetition of old arguments or minor mistakes is insufficient. Compliance with rules and the necessity of counsel's certificate to prevent frivolous reviews wasting judicial time were underscored. The Court dismissed the petition, emphasizing the finality of the earlier order and the need to conserve judicial time. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:32:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172204 The Supreme Court emphasized the stringent criteria for entertaining a review petition, highlighting that it should only be allowed in cases of glaring omissions, patent mistakes, or grave errors due to judicial fallibility. Mere repetition of old arguments or minor mistakes is insufficient. Compliance with rules and the necessity of counsel's certificate to prevent frivolous reviews wasting judicial time were underscored. The Court dismissed the petition, emphasizing the finality of the earlier order and the need to conserve judicial time. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172204