<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 535 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262618</link>
    <description>The claim for cash refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not interfered with, but the separate claim for interest on the refunded amount had not been adjudicated by either the Tribunal or the Commissioner. As the interest issue had been specifically noticed in the impugned order and remained undecided, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for determination in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 535 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262618</link>
      <description>The claim for cash refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not interfered with, but the separate claim for interest on the refunded amount had not been adjudicated by either the Tribunal or the Commissioner. As the interest issue had been specifically noticed in the impugned order and remained undecided, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for determination in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>