<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 519 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262602</link>
    <description>Tax effect operated as the threshold for entertaining the appeal; because the quantified tax effect was Rs. 4,22,830, the SC declined to admit the appeal and dismissed it without examining the merits. No substantive adjudication was undertaken, and the merits remained undecided as the matter was disposed of on the preliminary admissibility ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 01:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 519 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262602</link>
      <description>Tax effect operated as the threshold for entertaining the appeal; because the quantified tax effect was Rs. 4,22,830, the SC declined to admit the appeal and dismissed it without examining the merits. No substantive adjudication was undertaken, and the merits remained undecided as the matter was disposed of on the preliminary admissibility ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>