<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 518 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262601</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed because the appellant company had been wound up, leaving no entity available to prosecute the proceedings. The Court accepted counsel&#039;s statement on liquidation and treated the absence of a surviving body corporate as the sole ground for dismissal. No substantive legal issue was examined or decided, and the outcome turned entirely on the inability of the dissolved company to continue the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 518 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262601</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed because the appellant company had been wound up, leaving no entity available to prosecute the proceedings. The Court accepted counsel&#039;s statement on liquidation and treated the absence of a surviving body corporate as the sole ground for dismissal. No substantive legal issue was examined or decided, and the outcome turned entirely on the inability of the dissolved company to continue the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>