https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262600 The HC held the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the AO's failure to address the assessee's objections to reopening, as mandated by law. The Revenue's failure to challenge the CIT(A)'s order deleting the disallowance of management service fees rendered further examination of the reopening justification unnecessary. The ITAT's reliance on precedent cases supported the assessee's position. The decision was against the Revenue. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262600 The HC held the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the AO's failure to address the assessee's objections to reopening, as mandated by law. The Revenue's failure to challenge the CIT(A)'s order deleting the disallowance of management service fees rendered further examination of the reopening justification unnecessary. The ITAT's reliance on precedent cases supported the assessee's position. The decision was against the Revenue. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262600