<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 516 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262599</link>
    <description>The court held that the freight subsidy was not eligible for deduction under Section 80IC as it was to be adjusted against expenses. The sales tax deferment rebate was also deemed ineligible as it did not qualify as profits derived from the business. The issue of bank interest was remanded for further adjudication, with no substantial question of law determined at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 516 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262599</link>
      <description>The court held that the freight subsidy was not eligible for deduction under Section 80IC as it was to be adjusted against expenses. The sales tax deferment rebate was also deemed ineligible as it did not qualify as profits derived from the business. The issue of bank interest was remanded for further adjudication, with no substantial question of law determined at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>