https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172200 The petitioners were facing proceedings for recovery and confiscation of goods and penalty due to alleged clandestine removal of goods without payment of duty. The Additional Commissioner of Excise permitted provisional release of seized goods under specific conditions. The petitioners raised grievances regarding the provisional clearance of raw material and disputed the quantity of goods recorded in the panchnama. The court directed the petitioners to apply for provisional release of raw material within a week and ordered the competent authority to decide on the application within three weeks. The petitioners were allowed to clear finished goods under certain conditions, with the process ensuring accurate weighing and depositing of a specified amount. The court clarified that the clearance process was solely for quantity verification and would not affect pending disputes. The petition was disposed of with no costs. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:31:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172200 The petitioners were facing proceedings for recovery and confiscation of goods and penalty due to alleged clandestine removal of goods without payment of duty. The Additional Commissioner of Excise permitted provisional release of seized goods under specific conditions. The petitioners raised grievances regarding the provisional clearance of raw material and disputed the quantity of goods recorded in the panchnama. The court directed the petitioners to apply for provisional release of raw material within a week and ordered the competent authority to decide on the application within three weeks. The petitioners were allowed to clear finished goods under certain conditions, with the process ensuring accurate weighing and depositing of a specified amount. The court clarified that the clearance process was solely for quantity verification and would not affect pending disputes. The petition was disposed of with no costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172200