<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 417 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172189</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals below the monetary tax-effect threshold are treated as not maintainable where the governing circular applies to pending matters. The Karnataka High Court treated Circular No. 3 of 2011 as operating retrospectively and held that appeals falling below the prescribed limit could not be entertained on merits. The operative effect is that low-tax-effect appeals are barred by the circular and liable to dismissal at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 417 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172189</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals below the monetary tax-effect threshold are treated as not maintainable where the governing circular applies to pending matters. The Karnataka High Court treated Circular No. 3 of 2011 as operating retrospectively and held that appeals falling below the prescribed limit could not be entertained on merits. The operative effect is that low-tax-effect appeals are barred by the circular and liable to dismissal at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>