<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 801 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172186</link>
    <description>Dividend stripping was treated as finally concluded against the Revenue by prior decisions of the Delhi HC, and the respondent&#039;s concession reinforced that position. On that basis, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration, so there was no need to examine the merits of the dividend-stripping contention further. The appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:39:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 801 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172186</link>
      <description>Dividend stripping was treated as finally concluded against the Revenue by prior decisions of the Delhi HC, and the respondent&#039;s concession reinforced that position. On that basis, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration, so there was no need to examine the merits of the dividend-stripping contention further. The appeal was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>