<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (12) TMI 67 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172184</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Chapter XX of the U.P. Police Regulations. The Court held that Regulation 236(b) authorizing domiciliary visits was unconstitutional and violated Article 21. The petitioner was granted a writ of mandamus to cease domiciliary visits, while the rest of the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (12) TMI 67 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172184</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Chapter XX of the U.P. Police Regulations. The Court held that Regulation 236(b) authorizing domiciliary visits was unconstitutional and violated Article 21. The petitioner was granted a writ of mandamus to cease domiciliary visits, while the rest of the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>