<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1320 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172182</link>
    <description>On repeal and re-enactment, notifications authorising Inspectors of Police to investigate corruption offences continued to operate under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 because Section 30 had to be read with the general saving rules in Sections 6 and 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. The earlier notifications were not inconsistent with Section 17 of the 1988 Act, so they were deemed to survive and remain effective until superseded. Investigations conducted by the authorised Inspectors were therefore valid, the quashing of proceedings was unsustainable, and the prosecutions were directed to proceed according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1320 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172182</link>
      <description>On repeal and re-enactment, notifications authorising Inspectors of Police to investigate corruption offences continued to operate under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 because Section 30 had to be read with the general saving rules in Sections 6 and 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. The earlier notifications were not inconsistent with Section 17 of the 1988 Act, so they were deemed to survive and remain effective until superseded. Investigations conducted by the authorised Inspectors were therefore valid, the quashing of proceedings was unsustainable, and the prosecutions were directed to proceed according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>