<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (2) TMI 66 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172181</link>
    <description>Coal Mines Regulations made under the repealed Mines Act continued as subordinate legislation under the General Clauses Act following repeal and re-enactment, unless inconsistent with the later Act or superseded. Deeming language giving regulations effect as if enacted in the parent Act did not merge them into primary legislation. The expression &quot;any one of the directors&quot; was construed in light of the statutory scheme to make every director of an owning public company liable as an owner for mining-law offences; this interpretation did not create an Article 14 violation. Directors of managing agents were outside the statutory categories of owner, agent or manager and were not liable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (2) TMI 66 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172181</link>
      <description>Coal Mines Regulations made under the repealed Mines Act continued as subordinate legislation under the General Clauses Act following repeal and re-enactment, unless inconsistent with the later Act or superseded. Deeming language giving regulations effect as if enacted in the parent Act did not merge them into primary legislation. The expression &quot;any one of the directors&quot; was construed in light of the statutory scheme to make every director of an owning public company liable as an owner for mining-law offences; this interpretation did not create an Article 14 violation. Directors of managing agents were outside the statutory categories of owner, agent or manager and were not liable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>