https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172180 The Supreme Court consolidated four appeals with similar issues, rejecting the appellants' argument that a previous judgment did not bind them. The Court emphasized the importance of binding precedent and consistency in legal rulings, dismissing the appeals and ordering the parties to bear their own costs. The appellants' attempt to argue that the earlier judgment was per incuriam was rejected, as the Court found no glaring omission to support this claim. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:14:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172180 The Supreme Court consolidated four appeals with similar issues, rejecting the appellants' argument that a previous judgment did not bind them. The Court emphasized the importance of binding precedent and consistency in legal rulings, dismissing the appeals and ordering the parties to bear their own costs. The appellants' attempt to argue that the earlier judgment was per incuriam was rejected, as the Court found no glaring omission to support this claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172180