https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172176 An order is final when, read as a whole, it shows a concluded decision to cancel an allotment, even if implementation is postponed pending appeal. The later delay in implementation did not prevent the order from being acted on after 15 June 1952 because the relevant saving restriction was deleted by amendment. In writ jurisdiction, the High Court could entertain a second petition to hear persons affected by the earlier order who had not been impleaded, where this was needed to satisfy natural justice and prevent miscarriage of justice. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:25:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172176 An order is final when, read as a whole, it shows a concluded decision to cancel an allotment, even if implementation is postponed pending appeal. The later delay in implementation did not prevent the order from being acted on after 15 June 1952 because the relevant saving restriction was deleted by amendment. In writ jurisdiction, the High Court could entertain a second petition to hear persons affected by the earlier order who had not been impleaded, where this was needed to satisfy natural justice and prevent miscarriage of justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172176