<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 839 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172175</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that rental income derived by the assessee-company from letting out properties should be assessed under the head of &#039;Property Income&#039; and not &#039;Business Income&#039;. The Court did not address the applicability of section 43B for disallowing Urban Land Tax and non-deductibility of water supply costs from property income due to the classification of rental income as &#039;Property Income&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:10:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 839 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172175</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that rental income derived by the assessee-company from letting out properties should be assessed under the head of &#039;Property Income&#039; and not &#039;Business Income&#039;. The Court did not address the applicability of section 43B for disallowing Urban Land Tax and non-deductibility of water supply costs from property income due to the classification of rental income as &#039;Property Income&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>