<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 569 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172173</link>
    <description>Central Excise litigation in which a Special Leave Petition was filed and the Supreme Court entered an order dismissing the petition; the supplied text records the case citation, bench composition and dismissal but contains no reasons or substantive legal analysis, so no statutory interpretation, factual findings, or legal principles are stated in the document excerpt. The entry functions as a docket-level record of outcome only, not a reported legal reasoning memorandum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:49:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 569 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172173</link>
      <description>Central Excise litigation in which a Special Leave Petition was filed and the Supreme Court entered an order dismissing the petition; the supplied text records the case citation, bench composition and dismissal but contains no reasons or substantive legal analysis, so no statutory interpretation, factual findings, or legal principles are stated in the document excerpt. The entry functions as a docket-level record of outcome only, not a reported legal reasoning memorandum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>