<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1135 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172168</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned and the civil appeals were dismissed in a Central Excise matter, with the Supreme Court recording no substantive reasoning on the merits. The order therefore reflects only the procedural disposition of the appeals and does not set out any legal principle beyond the dismissal after condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1135 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172168</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned and the civil appeals were dismissed in a Central Excise matter, with the Supreme Court recording no substantive reasoning on the merits. The order therefore reflects only the procedural disposition of the appeals and does not set out any legal principle beyond the dismissal after condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>