<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 611 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172166</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the Cenvat credit and export rebate claims made by the respondent company, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and order. The Court found no merit in the allegation of fraudulent claim of Cenvat credit, noting that the raw material was indeed utilized for manufacture, and there was no revenue loss to the Department as Cenvat credit for exported goods had been refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:07:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 611 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172166</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the Cenvat credit and export rebate claims made by the respondent company, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and order. The Court found no merit in the allegation of fraudulent claim of Cenvat credit, noting that the raw material was indeed utilized for manufacture, and there was no revenue loss to the Department as Cenvat credit for exported goods had been refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>