<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cenvat Part II Register</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109025</link>
    <description>Where a refund sanctioned is less than the amount claimed, the claimant may take back the credit for the difference; RG 23A Part II has been abolished so a simple debit/credit accounting record suffices. Disallowed credits identified by the department should be reversed in subsequent returns or taken back into CENVAT credit, and the ledger/register balance should be reconciled with filed returns, with departmental clarification sought where reasons for partial disallowance are unclear.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:09:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cenvat Part II Register</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109025</link>
      <description>Where a refund sanctioned is less than the amount claimed, the claimant may take back the credit for the difference; RG 23A Part II has been abolished so a simple debit/credit accounting record suffices. Disallowed credits identified by the department should be reversed in subsequent returns or taken back into CENVAT credit, and the ledger/register balance should be reconciled with filed returns, with departmental clarification sought where reasons for partial disallowance are unclear.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:09:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>