https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172136 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions due to substantial delays in filing them. It emphasized that High Courts should not question National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission orders under their writ jurisdiction, as a statutory appeal route exists to the Supreme Court. The Court cautioned High Courts against entertaining such writ petitions and instructed the dissemination of this directive to all High Courts. en-us Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172136 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions due to substantial delays in filing them. It emphasized that High Courts should not question National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission orders under their writ jurisdiction, as a statutory appeal route exists to the Supreme Court. The Court cautioned High Courts against entertaining such writ petitions and instructed the dissemination of this directive to all High Courts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172136