https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262521 The Court upheld the imposition of a penalty on the petitioner for failing to declare the value of imported goods and not complying with customs procedures. The Court found that the petitioner's actions, including handing over blank documents and relying on proxies, contributed to the situation. Emphasizing the petitioner's responsibilities as a frequent traveler, the Court deemed the penalty reasonable based on the valuation of goods. It concluded that the order was not erroneous and dismissed the petition, stating it lacked merit for interference in writ jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262521 The Court upheld the imposition of a penalty on the petitioner for failing to declare the value of imported goods and not complying with customs procedures. The Court found that the petitioner's actions, including handing over blank documents and relying on proxies, contributed to the situation. Emphasizing the petitioner's responsibilities as a frequent traveler, the Court deemed the penalty reasonable based on the valuation of goods. It concluded that the order was not erroneous and dismissed the petition, stating it lacked merit for interference in writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262521