<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 436 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262519</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage, the court examines whether the record, taken at face value, discloses a prima facie case or grave suspicion; certainty of conviction is not required. Here, the shipping and exchange control forms showed inflated quantities and values, supporting the prosecution version and justifying refusal of discharge and framing of charges. On Section 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the absence of a separate charge under Section 13(1)(c) or Section 13(1)(d) does not bar invocation where the material alleges an attempt to commit the relevant corruption offence. The discharge order was set aside and trial was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 436 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262519</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage, the court examines whether the record, taken at face value, discloses a prima facie case or grave suspicion; certainty of conviction is not required. Here, the shipping and exchange control forms showed inflated quantities and values, supporting the prosecution version and justifying refusal of discharge and framing of charges. On Section 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the absence of a separate charge under Section 13(1)(c) or Section 13(1)(d) does not bar invocation where the material alleges an attempt to commit the relevant corruption offence. The discharge order was set aside and trial was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>