<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 419 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262502</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeals for the respective assessment years were partly allowed and allowed in one case. The Tribunal dismissed certain disallowances while upholding others based on the evidence and legal provisions presented. The validity of the reopening of the assessment was upheld, and interest-related claims were dismissed due to lack of submissions. Overall, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete certain disallowances and allowed the appeals in part and in full for different assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 06:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 419 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262502</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeals for the respective assessment years were partly allowed and allowed in one case. The Tribunal dismissed certain disallowances while upholding others based on the evidence and legal provisions presented. The validity of the reopening of the assessment was upheld, and interest-related claims were dismissed due to lack of submissions. Overall, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete certain disallowances and allowed the appeals in part and in full for different assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>