<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 895 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171978</link>
    <description>Non-production of a delivery note did not automatically attract penalty for transport of goods under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act. Penalty depends on whether the omission is explained by sufficient cause and whether surrounding circumstances indicate an intention to evade tax. On the facts, the driver carried the sale bill, the consignee&#039;s name was disclosed, and the absence of the delivery note was explained as inadvertent. The levy of penalty was therefore not warranted, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 895 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171978</link>
      <description>Non-production of a delivery note did not automatically attract penalty for transport of goods under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act. Penalty depends on whether the omission is explained by sufficient cause and whether surrounding circumstances indicate an intention to evade tax. On the facts, the driver carried the sale bill, the consignee&#039;s name was disclosed, and the absence of the delivery note was explained as inadvertent. The levy of penalty was therefore not warranted, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>