<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1494 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant in a case involving waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 2.1 crore, initially refunded but later deemed recoverable. The dispute arose from discrepancies in the assessment of iron ore fines exported due to provisional basis evaluation and finalization of FOB price. The Tribunal emphasized the need for uniformity in assessment practices, interpreting a Circular to support the applicant&#039;s argument for total waiver of pre-deposit dues and staying the recovery during the appeal process. The decision underscored adherence to policy decisions for uniformity and certainty in taxation, ultimately granting relief to the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1494 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant in a case involving waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 2.1 crore, initially refunded but later deemed recoverable. The dispute arose from discrepancies in the assessment of iron ore fines exported due to provisional basis evaluation and finalization of FOB price. The Tribunal emphasized the need for uniformity in assessment practices, interpreting a Circular to support the applicant&#039;s argument for total waiver of pre-deposit dues and staying the recovery during the appeal process. The decision underscored adherence to policy decisions for uniformity and certainty in taxation, ultimately granting relief to the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>