<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1492 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172116</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s right to levy interest on Central Excise duty for the period in question. The Court held that interest under Section 11AB is applicable on delayed duty payment, regardless of the reason. The appellant was granted the authority to impose the appropriate rate of interest on the Central Excise duty from September 2001 to February 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1492 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172116</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant&#039;s right to levy interest on Central Excise duty for the period in question. The Court held that interest under Section 11AB is applicable on delayed duty payment, regardless of the reason. The appellant was granted the authority to impose the appropriate rate of interest on the Central Excise duty from September 2001 to February 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>