https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172114 The dispute involved the classification of Gypsum Plasters under Tariff Item 2520 versus Tariff Heading 38.24. The applicants claimed classification under Tariff Item 2520, while the Revenue proposed classification under Tariff Heading 38.24, leading to a demand for duty. The applicants argued that Gypsum Plasters fell under Tariff Entry 2520. The applicants contended that the demand was time-barred and sought a waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal directed the applicants to deposit Rs. one crore within eight weeks, with the balance of duty, interest, and penalties waived for the appeal hearing. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172114 The dispute involved the classification of Gypsum Plasters under Tariff Item 2520 versus Tariff Heading 38.24. The applicants claimed classification under Tariff Item 2520, while the Revenue proposed classification under Tariff Heading 38.24, leading to a demand for duty. The applicants argued that Gypsum Plasters fell under Tariff Entry 2520. The applicants contended that the demand was time-barred and sought a waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal directed the applicants to deposit Rs. one crore within eight weeks, with the balance of duty, interest, and penalties waived for the appeal hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172114