<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1022 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals in a case involving Central Excise duty on cut flowers cleared into DTA without payment of duty. It was held that duty demands on cut flowers, considered non-excisable items produced in India, are not sustainable under Notification No. 126/94-Cus. The Tribunal clarified that duty should be demanded on imported inputs used in production, not on the cut flowers themselves. Therefore, the appeals lacked merit and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1022 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals in a case involving Central Excise duty on cut flowers cleared into DTA without payment of duty. It was held that duty demands on cut flowers, considered non-excisable items produced in India, are not sustainable under Notification No. 126/94-Cus. The Tribunal clarified that duty should be demanded on imported inputs used in production, not on the cut flowers themselves. Therefore, the appeals lacked merit and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>