<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 620 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172018</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the original authority to conduct de novo adjudication, allowing the appellant to present documentation for export consignments. The appellant was instructed to produce all relevant documents for verification. Duty for damaged goods received back was upheld as no remission was claimed. The dispute regarding other consignments was remanded for further adjudication within a reasonable period, dating back to 1996. The stay application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 620 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172018</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the original authority to conduct de novo adjudication, allowing the appellant to present documentation for export consignments. The appellant was instructed to produce all relevant documents for verification. Duty for damaged goods received back was upheld as no remission was claimed. The dispute regarding other consignments was remanded for further adjudication within a reasonable period, dating back to 1996. The stay application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>