<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 614 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172012</link>
    <description>In a transferable licence scheme, the condition of non-availment of Modvat credit on inputs used in export goods could not be fastened on a transferee who had no direct knowledge of the original manufacture. The burden remained on the department, or on the original licence holder, to prove breach of that condition; in the absence of evidence of credit availment, suppression, collusion or wilful misstatement, the extended limitation period and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 614 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172012</link>
      <description>In a transferable licence scheme, the condition of non-availment of Modvat credit on inputs used in export goods could not be fastened on a transferee who had no direct knowledge of the original manufacture. The burden remained on the department, or on the original licence holder, to prove breach of that condition; in the absence of evidence of credit availment, suppression, collusion or wilful misstatement, the extended limitation period and penalty were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>