<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 696 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Grindwell Norton Ltd, setting aside the adjudication order and confirming a demand under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal clarified that sales tax amounts retained by the assessee were permissible deductions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 696 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Grindwell Norton Ltd, setting aside the adjudication order and confirming a demand under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal clarified that sales tax amounts retained by the assessee were permissible deductions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>