<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 722 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172029</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals solely on the ground of delay, without entering into the substantive central excise dispute. The order records that, after hearing the appellant, the Court found the appeals fit for dismissal only because they were time-barred. No merits-based determination was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 722 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172029</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals solely on the ground of delay, without entering into the substantive central excise dispute. The order records that, after hearing the appellant, the Court found the appeals fit for dismissal only because they were time-barred. No merits-based determination was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>