<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 720 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172027</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal solely on the ground of delay after hearing the appellant&#039;s counsel. No substantive central excise issue was examined, and the dismissal was confined to the delay in filing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 720 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172027</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal solely on the ground of delay after hearing the appellant&#039;s counsel. No substantive central excise issue was examined, and the dismissal was confined to the delay in filing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>