<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 817 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172038</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the confiscation and penalty imposed by the Revenue department on goods claimed to be of foreign origin, as the impugned goods were not listed under Section 123 of the Customs Act. The Revenue&#039;s failure to prove smuggling, lack of investigation into the goods&#039; origin, and absence of evidence supporting their claims resulted in the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 817 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172038</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the confiscation and penalty imposed by the Revenue department on goods claimed to be of foreign origin, as the impugned goods were not listed under Section 123 of the Customs Act. The Revenue&#039;s failure to prove smuggling, lack of investigation into the goods&#039; origin, and absence of evidence supporting their claims resulted in the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>