<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 686 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172004</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications must be construed strictly, but eligibility under Notification No. 21/2002-Customs depends on the contractual and project records. The concession agreement, letter of acceptance and project authority certificate showed that the importer had been awarded the project work and was treated as a named sub-contractor for the eligible project. The exclusion of Revenue&#039;s reliance on earlier joint venture and consortium cases was accepted because those facts were different. The exemption was therefore available and the challenge to the claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 686 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172004</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications must be construed strictly, but eligibility under Notification No. 21/2002-Customs depends on the contractual and project records. The concession agreement, letter of acceptance and project authority certificate showed that the importer had been awarded the project work and was treated as a named sub-contractor for the eligible project. The exclusion of Revenue&#039;s reliance on earlier joint venture and consortium cases was accepted because those facts were different. The exemption was therefore available and the challenge to the claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>