<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 751 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172001</link>
    <description>Interim stay was granted pending departmental reference proceedings where the Department&#039;s references on the same issue were already pending before the Principal Bench. The court noted that the petitioner relied on earlier final Tribunal orders on the issue, and found no justification to refuse interim relief in that setting. The operative effect was that the petitioner obtained stay protection while the reference proceedings remained pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 751 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172001</link>
      <description>Interim stay was granted pending departmental reference proceedings where the Department&#039;s references on the same issue were already pending before the Principal Bench. The court noted that the petitioner relied on earlier final Tribunal orders on the issue, and found no justification to refuse interim relief in that setting. The operative effect was that the petitioner obtained stay protection while the reference proceedings remained pending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>