<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1332 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172090</link>
    <description>In taxing statutes, classification follows common parlance and trade understanding unless the legislation shows a contrary intention. Applying that approach, the Rajasthan HC treated Entry 125 of Schedule IV as covering corrective eyewear such as spectacles, frames, lenses, contact lenses and lens cleaners, not sunglasses, which are ordinarily used for protection from sunlight and glare. The entry&#039;s history and trade parlance supported a separate commercial identity for sunglasses. As the goods were not covered by the specific entry, the residuary entry in Schedule V applied, and the concurrent classification finding was upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1332 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172090</link>
      <description>In taxing statutes, classification follows common parlance and trade understanding unless the legislation shows a contrary intention. Applying that approach, the Rajasthan HC treated Entry 125 of Schedule IV as covering corrective eyewear such as spectacles, frames, lenses, contact lenses and lens cleaners, not sunglasses, which are ordinarily used for protection from sunlight and glare. The entry&#039;s history and trade parlance supported a separate commercial identity for sunglasses. As the goods were not covered by the specific entry, the residuary entry in Schedule V applied, and the concurrent classification finding was upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>