<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172132</link>
    <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty cannot be denied merely because proof of VAT payment was filed after the refund application, if the evidence was already on record and considered before final adjudication. Notification No. 102/2007 requires the importer to furnish documents evidencing payment of sales tax or VAT, but the decisive requirement is compliance being verified before sanction of refund, not strict attachment on the filing date. On that basis, denial of refund was held unsustainable and the original sanction was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172132</link>
      <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty cannot be denied merely because proof of VAT payment was filed after the refund application, if the evidence was already on record and considered before final adjudication. Notification No. 102/2007 requires the importer to furnish documents evidencing payment of sales tax or VAT, but the decisive requirement is compliance being verified before sanction of refund, not strict attachment on the filing date. On that basis, denial of refund was held unsustainable and the original sanction was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>