https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172098 The appellant availed cenvat credit on iron and steel items but faced denial by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal ruled the demand as time-barred under Section 11A due to conflicting views of higher Courts during the relevant period. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held that the demand was beyond the normal limitation period and allowed the appeal, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172098 The appellant availed cenvat credit on iron and steel items but faced denial by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal ruled the demand as time-barred under Section 11A due to conflicting views of higher Courts during the relevant period. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held that the demand was beyond the normal limitation period and allowed the appeal, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172098