<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1339 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172097</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution after repeated non-appearance by the appellant despite the matter being called twice on the scheduled hearing date. The court had earlier adjourned the case when no appearance was made, and when there was still no representation on the next date, it declined to proceed further and terminated the matter for default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1339 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172097</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution after repeated non-appearance by the appellant despite the matter being called twice on the scheduled hearing date. The court had earlier adjourned the case when no appearance was made, and when there was still no representation on the next date, it declined to proceed further and terminated the matter for default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>