<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1558 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172103</link>
    <description>Purchase and sale of SIM cards, where the telecom provider had already discharged service tax on the full value, was treated as not amounting to Business Auxiliary Service in the earlier binding decision relied on by the Court. Applying that settled position, the Court found no live or substantial question of law in the present appeal and declined further admission or adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1558 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172103</link>
      <description>Purchase and sale of SIM cards, where the telecom provider had already discharged service tax on the full value, was treated as not amounting to Business Auxiliary Service in the earlier binding decision relied on by the Court. Applying that settled position, the Court found no live or substantial question of law in the present appeal and declined further admission or adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>