<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1562 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty imposed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, on the appellant for failing to fulfill export obligations under an EPCG license. The appellate authority reduced the penalty from &amp;amp;8377; 3,80,000 to &amp;amp;8377; 2,00,000. The Tribunal upheld the appeal, citing precedent, and no costs were awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1562 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty imposed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, on the appellant for failing to fulfill export obligations under an EPCG license. The appellate authority reduced the penalty from &amp;amp;8377; 3,80,000 to &amp;amp;8377; 2,00,000. The Tribunal upheld the appeal, citing precedent, and no costs were awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>