https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171973 Special leave already granted was not revoked, as the Court found no ground to recall it and considered the constitutional and procedural questions fit for consideration by a larger Bench of seven Judges. The separate prayer to vacate the stay was also rejected. The order therefore maintained the leave, kept the stay in place, and directed listing before the larger Bench. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171973 Special leave already granted was not revoked, as the Court found no ground to recall it and considered the constitutional and procedural questions fit for consideration by a larger Bench of seven Judges. The separate prayer to vacate the stay was also rejected. The order therefore maintained the leave, kept the stay in place, and directed listing before the larger Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171973