<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 689 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171965</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the trial court&#039;s decree. The court held that the decree was valid, notice was properly served, the court had jurisdiction, the respondents were not necessary parties, and the decree was executable against them. The interim stay was vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 689 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171965</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the trial court&#039;s decree. The court held that the decree was valid, notice was properly served, the court had jurisdiction, the respondents were not necessary parties, and the decree was executable against them. The interim stay was vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>