<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1057 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171948</link>
    <description>Entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 4/2007-C.E. turned on whether goods supplied in packaged condition for use in the construction industry fell within the notification. The text states that the issue was already covered by a decision between the same parties in a connected appeal, where the assessee&#039;s claim to exemption was accepted and the Revenue&#039;s objection rejected. On that basis, the exemption was applied here as well, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1057 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171948</link>
      <description>Entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 4/2007-C.E. turned on whether goods supplied in packaged condition for use in the construction industry fell within the notification. The text states that the issue was already covered by a decision between the same parties in a connected appeal, where the assessee&#039;s claim to exemption was accepted and the Revenue&#039;s objection rejected. On that basis, the exemption was applied here as well, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>