<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Adding Sugar Value to Undisclosed Income Due to Lack of Concrete Evidence, Mere Prosecution Insufficient.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24179</link>
    <description>Bogus purchases - Merely because the assessee was being prosecuted for keeping the sugar beyond the permissible limit and was trading in the same by sale and purchase on as is where is basis and as per his own case on credit could not entitle the Assessing Officer to add the value of the sugar to his undisclosed income which was done on the basis of conjectures. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:29:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:29:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Adding Sugar Value to Undisclosed Income Due to Lack of Concrete Evidence, Mere Prosecution Insufficient.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24179</link>
      <description>Bogus purchases - Merely because the assessee was being prosecuted for keeping the sugar beyond the permissible limit and was trading in the same by sale and purchase on as is where is basis and as per his own case on credit could not entitle the Assessing Officer to add the value of the sugar to his undisclosed income which was done on the basis of conjectures. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:29:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>