https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171941 A governmental rent-reassessment recommendation was held to be advisory only and not binding absent an express contractual undertaking or statutory compulsion. The dispute was also found not to fall within the arbitration clause because it arose from government memoranda and the alleged obligation to act on the Hiring Committee's recommendation, not from the lease covenants themselves. On that basis, the writ petition was maintainable, further reassessment and compelled payment on the recommended rent were unjustified, and rent continued to be governed by the agreed terms unless validly varied. Excess amounts received over the agreed rent were directed to be refunded. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171941 A governmental rent-reassessment recommendation was held to be advisory only and not binding absent an express contractual undertaking or statutory compulsion. The dispute was also found not to fall within the arbitration clause because it arose from government memoranda and the alleged obligation to act on the Hiring Committee's recommendation, not from the lease covenants themselves. On that basis, the writ petition was maintainable, further reassessment and compelled payment on the recommended rent were unjustified, and rent continued to be governed by the agreed terms unless validly varied. Excess amounts received over the agreed rent were directed to be refunded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171941